Climate Models for the layman | Report

Date:

There is considerable debate over the fidelity and utility of global climate models

(GCMs). This debate occurs within the community of climate scientists, who disagree

about the amount of weight to give to climate models relative to observational analyses.

GCM outputs are also used by economists, regulatory agencies and policy makers,

so GCMs have received considerable scrutiny from a broader community of scientists,

engineers, software experts, and philosophers of science. This report attempts

to describe the debate surrounding GCMs to an educated but nontechnical audience.

Key summary points

  • GCMs have not been subject to the rigorous verification and validation that is

the norm for engineering and regulatory science.

  • There are valid concerns about a fundamental lack of predictability in the complex

nonlinear climate system.

  • There are numerous arguments supporting the conclusion that climate models

are not fit for the purpose of identifying with high confidence the proportion

of the 20th century warming that was human-caused as opposed to natural.

  • There is growing evidence that climate models predict too much warming from

increased atmospheric carbon dioxide.

  • The climate model simulation results for the 21st century reported by the Intergovernmental

Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) do not include key elements

of climate variability, and hence are not useful as projections for how the 21st

century climate will actually evolve.

Climate models are useful tools for conducting scientific research to understand the

climate system. However, the above points support the conclusion that current GCMs

are not fit for the purpose of attributing the causes of 20th century warming or for

predicting global or regional climate change on timescales of decades to centuries,

with any high level of confidence. By extension, GCMs are not fit for the purpose of

justifying political policies to fundamentally alter world social, economic and energy

systems. It is this application of climate model results that fuels the vociferousness of

the debate surrounding climate models.

Read full report here.

Judith Curry – Global Warming Policy Foundation – 2017

Want More Investigative Content?

Curate RegWatch
Curate RegWatchhttps://regulatorwatch.com
In addition to our original coverage, RegWatch curates top stories on issues and impacts arising from the regulation of economic, social and environmental activity in Canada and the U.S.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

MORE VAPING

Industry Plot? | FDA Commissioner Denigrates Tobacco Harm Reduction | RegWatch

Does the regulator responsible for overseeing tobacco products in the U.S. believe in the practice of tobacco harm reduction? According to FDA Commissioner Robert...